Project Management Success Criteria of Management

Question: Describe about the Project Management for the Success Criteria of Management. Answer: Atkinson, R (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project management, Vol 17, Issue 6, pp. 337342. In this article Atkinson (1999), presents some views in context to the success criteria for management of IS-IT projects. The author have analyzed various factors that are believed to contribute towards success or failure in management of projects. From analysis, the research have provided that over the past 50 years the Iron Triangle comprising of Cost, time and quality have been remarkably associated with measuring the success of project management. The time and costs are usually included over the same period while describing project management as these two are best guesses estimated at a certain period when the project is unknown to the management. This article represents that Quality is an occurrence, which is a new property of individuals diverse states of mind, and convictions, which regularly change over the advancement life cycle of a project. In this paper, the contentions have likewise been done considering different achievement criteria is advanced, isolating these into a few things which are done wrong and different things which have been missed or not worked out quite as well as they could have done. Clients and clients are case of partners of data frameworks projects and the criteria they consider as vital for achievement ought to be incorporated into evaluating a project. Furthermore, this paper proposes another structure to consider achievement criteria. The center of this paper is achievement criteria for administration of projects. Atkinson (1999) proposes to move the center of estimation for project administration from the selective procedure driven criteria, The Iron Triangle to The Square Route. It is further proposed that movement could be altogether helped if a definition for task administration was created which did exclude restricted achievement criteria. It can be concluded from this paper measuring the procedure criteria for project administration is measuring productivity. Measuring the achievement of the resultant framework or association benefits, the criteria changes to that of surveying, getting something right, meeting objectives, measuring viability.